Retirement readiness is not a single number. It is the intersection of financial readiness (can you fund the retirement you envision?), structural readiness (are all the right decisions, documents, and advisors in place?), and life planning readiness (do you know what you're retiring toward?). Most people focus only on the first — and discover the others matter just as much, often after it's too late to optimize them.
See My Readiness ScoreFree. Private. Takes about 4 minutes.
The standard question — "Do I have enough money to retire?" — is necessary but not sufficient. A complete retirement readiness picture includes:
Identifies income sources, timing, withdrawal rates, tax treatment, and how expenses are covered in each phase of retirement — including a modeling of portfolio sustainability under different return scenarios.
Both spouses' optimal claiming ages modeled together, including survivor benefit implications and break-even analysis under realistic longevity assumptions.
Specific plan for coverage, cost, and source for the years before Medicare eligibility — including whether any ACA subsidy applies based on expected retirement income.
Analysis of the tax bracket available between retirement and age 73, with a conversion plan that reduces lifetime tax liability by converting at lower rates before RMDs begin.
Projection of Required Minimum Distributions beginning at 73 — including how they affect Social Security taxation, Medicare IRMAA, and total taxable income in later retirement years.
Will or trust, financial power of attorney, healthcare directive — all reviewed within the last 3-5 years and reflecting current family circumstances and intentions.
All retirement account and life insurance beneficiary designations verified — including that no deceased individuals or ex-spouses remain named.
Assessment of whether long-term care insurance, hybrid life/LTC coverage, or self-funding is the right approach — while still in the age window where favorable underwriting is available.
Financial advisor, CPA, and estate attorney in communication — with a shared understanding of the retirement income plan and each advisor's role in executing it.
Clear sense of how time will be structured, what purpose and identity will be maintained, and how the transition from work will be navigated — not just financial readiness, but personal readiness.
How many of these 10 items have you actually completed? The Axel Index helps identify which dimensions of retirement readiness still need attention.
See My Readiness ScoreSocial Security timing is the single most commonly suboptimized decision in retirement planning. Most people make the claiming decision reactively — when they retire or when income pressure builds — rather than proactively, with a full analysis of both spouses' optimal strategies.
The mathematical case for delaying Social Security is strong for those with sufficient assets to bridge the gap: benefits grow by approximately 8% per year for each year of delay between full retirement age and age 70. The break-even age between claiming at 62 vs. 70 is typically around 82-83. For married couples who expect one spouse to live well past 83, the delayed claiming strategy tends to produce significantly more total lifetime household income.
The survivor benefit dimension is particularly important. The surviving spouse receives the higher of the two spouses' Social Security benefits. The higher earner's claiming age therefore determines the survivor benefit that the lower earner will receive if they outlive the higher earner. Claiming early — even at full retirement age — permanently reduces what could have been a larger survivor benefit. For couples where there is a significant earnings disparity, the higher earner's delay to 70 is often the most important single Social Security decision.
The period between retirement and age 73 is frequently the lowest-tax window of a retiree's remaining life. Earned income has stopped, Required Minimum Distributions have not yet begun, and Social Security may not yet have been claimed. In this window, marginal tax brackets are often lower than they were during peak earning years — and lower than they will be once RMDs add mandatory taxable income starting at 73.
Converting traditional IRA funds to Roth during this window produces a tax cost now, at lower rates, in exchange for avoiding higher taxes later when RMDs force distributions at potentially higher brackets. Over a 10-15 year conversion program, the cumulative tax savings can be significant — not from investment returns, but purely from the rate differential between the conversion rate and the eventual RMD rate.
The Roth conversion window also reduces future Medicare IRMAA surcharges by reducing the traditional IRA balances that will produce RMDs. IRMAA surcharges are assessed based on income from 2 years prior and can add $2,000-$12,000/year in Medicare premium costs for higher-income beneficiaries. Reducing RMD income through earlier Roth conversion directly reduces future IRMAA exposure.
Retirement readiness is a multi-dimensional assessment — not a balance sheet check. Financial readiness, Social Security timing, healthcare planning, tax efficiency, estate structure, and life planning all matter. The decisions made in the 3-5 years before retirement are among the most consequential financial decisions of a lifetime — and they benefit from deliberate planning, not reactive responses to life events.
The Axel Index identifies retirement readiness gaps across income, Social Security, healthcare, tax, and estate dimensions — before they become permanent. Free, private, takes about 4 minutes.
See My Readiness Score